Consider these two statements:
1. My child is safe
in school.
2. My child is not in
danger in school.
Now expand consideration of the core of those two
statements. Is it better to be safe or
not in danger? In a free society, which
condition is preferable? To be able to
come and go, when and where desired without the concern for personal safety
would appear to be the better alternative.
An artificial level of security or safety derived from bullet proof
glass, locked doors, and/or armed guards does not imply the desirable
experience of freedom that many fellow citizens would like to believe they
enjoy. Not only that, but what safety
measures are ever truly infallible.
The preference to be safe or free from danger should
influence the discussions of what to do about gun violence, domestic violence,
or violence of any kind that threatens any member of society.
No comments:
Post a Comment