Guest post from Occupy Rapid City:
This Saturday, April 21,
2012 at 12:45 pm Occupy Rapid City will walk from Main Street Square to KOTA in
order to shine a light on the role of the media in disempowering women. KOTA
continues to broadcast Rush Limbaugh in spite of his documented attacks on
women. He has repeatedly and infamously referred to any women who are
politically active on equality issues as “femi-nazis.” He seems to think that
the only appropriate role for women in the 21st Century is to remain barefoot
and pregnant.
Not only does KOTA continue to broadcast Rush Limbaugh, but it
also aligns itself with the one percent corporate interests in this country,
rather than the ninety-nine percent of the rest of the population. The more
general role of the corporate owned and controlled media locally and nationally
in marginalizing and disempowering women was exposed in a recent showing in
Rapid City of Miss Representation. This film highlighted the many ways that
women are sexualized and distorted on a daily basis in our media culture. It is
a documentary film by Jennifer Siebel Newsom and features interviews with
Condaleezza Rice, Katie Couric, Nancy Pelosi, Gloria Steinem, Geena Davis,
Rachel Maddow, Margeret Cho, and Rosario Dawson. It documents how the media only
wants to focus on trivial and sexualized aspects of women, instead of having an
honest discourse on the issues that women are raising. One example in the film
was the media’s focus on Sarah Palin’s legs and physical appearance instead of
the substance of her political stances on the issues.
The recent local
showing of this film was sponsored by PROJECT RESPECT.ORG, an organization that
“works to combat sexual and gender based violence amongst South Dakota’s Native
American youth by promoting healthy, responsible and respectful relationships.”
Proceeds from the event went to WAVI-Working Against Violence, Inc., an
organization that “works to create a community free of domestic abuse and sexual
assault through advocacy, education and support services.”
The
following statement is by Jim Peterson of Occupy Rapid City:
As you may or
may not be aware, the Occupy Rapid City group has weekly demonstrations every
Saturday, beginning at noon at Main Street Square. The overarching theme is
always corporate control of every facet of our lives, but a weekly emphasis is
chosen based on a timely issue currently in the limelight. This Saturday, April
21, we will try to bring to the attention of the public/media the concerns
depicted in the recently shown movie Miss Representation. More specifically we
will try and connect the dots between the media and the objectification and
degradation of women. We will meet as usual at the Square, at noon, with
appropriate signs and then around 12:45 walk the two blocks to the KOTA studio
to once again shine a light on Rush Limbaugh’s disgusting behavior, vis-à-vis
women. The previous demonstration at KOTA was an appropriate response to a
specific episode, but the bigger issues pointed out by Miss Representation need
to be addressed also.
We would encourage every woman you know (and men !!) to
join us for an hour or so this Saturday. The reality is that one short
demonstration is not going to affect significant change, which is why Occupy
groups step up continuously…. PLEASE take the time to join us and encourage all
your friends and group members to do likewise. Signage which speaks to the
points raised in the Miss Representation film would be most helpful and
appropriate. If anyone has any questions have them call me at (605) 342-6245.
Thanks for all that you do to make our community a better place……..Jim
Petersen
###
For More Information:
Mary Ellen Uptain
605.341.0724
Jim Peterson 605.342.6245
Occupy Rapid City
occupyrapidcity.org
Showing posts with label Guest Editorial. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Guest Editorial. Show all posts
Thursday, April 19, 2012
Monday, March 5, 2012
BAD BILLBOARD BILL Guest Editorial
GOVERNOR DAUGAARD; PLEASE VETO SB-157
By Tom Katus*
The BAD BILLBOARD BILL , SB 157 has passed and will go into law. The vote:
42 to 26. It took 10 BILLBOARD
Lobbyists, being paid tens of thousands of dollars by the BIG BILLBOARD
CORPORATIONS to get this vote! We had 0
dollars and the people to represent. You
now know what runs your State Government!
A sad day for the
citizens of South Dakota ,
and local control of its municipalities and counties...
--Lisa
Modrick
Scenic
Rapid City Committee, Inc.
SD LEGISLATURE BOUGHT BY SIGN
COMPANIES
--
Sign at Occupy Rapid City
Rally, March 3rd.
The people of Rapid
City and West River are livid about the majority of East River ’s Legislators’ arrogance to override a local
initiative, for which scores of us circulated petitions to have a vote on
billboard control. That vote of 6,000 + was more than 2/3rds majority of the
people. I am certain that citizens of
Brookings, Sioux Falls , Aberdeen ,
Watertown , Mitchell, and Pierre would feel similarly affronted if an
initiated measure in their city, securing more than 2/3rds of the vote were
overturned by the Legislature.
The undue influence of moneyed
interests in the federal government has lead to widespread cynicism of the
people and a Congressional approval rating of 11%. Now the East River
majority in the SD Legislature is acting equally irresponsibly and thwarting
the will of the people.
We have many divisions in this
State, including age, gender, race and partisanism. However, the greatest division remains the split
between East and West
River . When I served in the Senate and when I ran
for State Treasurer, my major theme was to work hard to overcome these East/West
Divisions and bring ALL South Dakotans together.
Last month, I lead a delegation
of Legislative Fellows selected from throughout the US
by our State Department to visit Nepal . We spent a week meeting with
political leaders and non governmental organizations (NGOs) assisting them with
their constitutional review. Nepal
is transitioning from an authoritarian centralized government to a federal
democratic system. I was asked to address their National Lawyers Association,
on behalf of our group, on the US Constitutional review process culminating at Independence
Hall in Philadelphia
in July, 1789. I stressed that perhaps
the greatest strength of our federal system is extensive LOCAL CONTROL. A fellow delegate who is a Councilman from Concord , New Hampshire
reinforced this view. The Nepalese were
very impressed with LOCAL CONTROL, and are hopeful they can institute it in
their country.
Thus, it is particularly
disheartening to return to SD to find that a majority of our East River Legislators
has overturned the people's will.
Governor Daugaard has made some excellent strides in reaching out to ALL our people. His positive decisions on Valhalla and the Black Hills Playhouse are commendable.
Vetoing this onerous legislation, would certainly reinforce his strength in the
Republican Heartland of West River. While
such a stance may irritate the deep pocket sign companies, it will definitely
make him more popular with 6,000+ Rapid
City voters and the tourism industry. Tourism has much
greater economic impact on the State than three wealthy sign companies and
their 10 paid lobbyists!.
But regardless of the politics of any such
decision, a veto would be the right thing for ALL
the people of South Dakota . I am hopeful that he will once again rise
above politics and do the right thing. I urge Governor Daugaard to veto SB
157. I am confident that we would have
sufficient strength in the SD House of Representatives to sustain his veto.
*********
Tom Katus served as a State
Senator (2007-08), is a member of Scenic Rapid City and Occupy Rapid City.
Friday, February 24, 2012
SOUTH DAKOTA ELECTED OFFICIALS SUPPORT GOLIATH WHILE CITIZENS SUPPORT DAVID
The following guest post is a public news release:
SOUTH
DAKOTA ELECTED OFFICIALS SUPPORT GOLIATH
WHILE
CITIZENS SUPPORT DAVID
Citizen Protest
Against Private Foreign Companies Use of Eminent Domain
(Rapid City, SD) South Dakota elected officials
including Senator Thune, Representative Noem, Governor Daugaard, and the SD
Legislature continue to support TransCanada, a foreign corporation, over South
Dakota landowners. Even after the Presidential permit for the proposed Keystone
XL pipeline has been denied, TransCanada continues to move forward with eminent
domain court proceedings against local landowners.
This Saturday, February 25, 2012 at noon,
citizens of South Dakota will come together at Main Street Square in downtown
Rapid City to protest TransCanada’s continued bullying of landowners and our
elected officials who continue to repeat false statements about the proposed
project. Citizens will speak up against their elected officials ignoring their
constituents. Members of groups supporting this action include Occupy Rapid
City, Dakota Rural Action, and SD Peace and Justice. We believe the Davids of
our country should be represented when the Goliaths, like TransCanada, do not
play fair.
While a construction project will bring
short-term jobs, long-term growth for SD depends upon the health of our soil
and water and the families who have spent their lives as stewards of these
resources. Why would private property rights be given away to a foreign company
that has not proven they can care for the land, its resources, and water?
Dakota Rural Action, a grassroots organizing
non-profit, recently introduced HB 1111 into SD Legislation. This bill aims to
create an even playing field for both landowners and private organizations and
define a clear process for good faith negotiations where eminent domain is used
as a last resort in the development of railroads and large transmission
pipelines for hydrocarbons. Unfortunately, the bill failed on the House floor
last week with a 35 to 35 reconsideration vote.
“According to The
New York Times, the company has at least 34 eminent domain actions against
landowners in Texas, and 22 in South Dakota.2 And
their threats to landowners in Nebraska3
helped spark massive public opposition and a special legislative session that
were key in the decision to consider a different route.” -Credo
Action
South Dakota landowners have
proven and earned their right to private property rights over multiple
generations through their responsible stewardship. Why are we letting the
Goliaths continue with condemnation proceedings on a project that offers little
public benefit?
For More Information:
Clay and Mary Ellen Uptain
Occupy Rapid City
605.341.0724
Jessica Miller
Dakota Rural Action
605.716.2200
Jim Peterson
SD Peace & Justice
1. "Keystone XL Pipeline: Texas Farmer Wins Temporary Restraining Order Against TransCanada," Huffington Post,
February 14, 2012
2. "Eminent Domain Fight Has a Canadian Twist," New York Times, October 17th, 2011
3. "TransCanada Keystone XL Eminent Domain Threat Letter ," Dirty Oil Sands
4. "Texans rally against Keystone XL oil pipeline easement," LA Times, February 17, 2012
2. "Eminent Domain Fight Has a Canadian Twist," New York Times, October 17th, 2011
3. "TransCanada Keystone XL Eminent Domain Threat Letter ," Dirty Oil Sands
4. "Texans rally against Keystone XL oil pipeline easement," LA Times, February 17, 2012
Sunday, January 22, 2012
It's a case of "kill the messenger"
Guest editorial
Few people
will deny the U.S.
faces a serious economic crisis, an economic
In the
November 17 issue of Western Ag Reporter, every other letter writer or columnist gave
environmentalists or the Occupy Wall Street movement a whack. Why? Was it tree
huggers or was it Paul Volker, chairman of the Federal Reserve, who raised
interest rates to 21% in the 1980s, resulting in an economic crisis in rural America ? Who was President of the U.S. when the E.P.A. was created
and the clean air and clean water acts passed... socialist Adolph Hitler or
Republican Richard Nixon? Was it the
Occupiers or the Banksters that created the housing bubble that ultimately
crashed, creating a global crisis?
After the
1929 crash and depression, numerous restrictions were placed on Wall Street to
prevent a re-occurrence. Who removed those public safe guards.. the occupiers or
Congress? The power of eminent domain to take private property was granted to corporations.
Who changed the rules and constitution? Occupiers or Supreme Court?
Who robbed the Social Security trust fund and left only IOUs
and a pending crisis? Occupiers or Congress?
Was it the Occupiers or Congress that negotiated the Free Trade
agreements that gutted U.S.
manufacturing and exported 10 million jobs to third-world slave labor? Was it a
tree hugger or a federal judge who voided a billion-dollar jury verdict in
favor of U.S.
cattlemen? The ceaseless flow of 35 million illegals have overwhelmed our
schools, hospitals, and welfare agencies and spawned unprecedented drug
violence. Who condones and even encourages and exploits this illegal flow?
Corporate hogs, dairy, poultry, meat packers, and fruit and vegetable growers
or the Occupy Wall Street protesters?
I haven't
made a personal inspection of the Occupiers so I can't speak with authority on
their lack of cleanliness as some have, but I view them as analogous to
canaries in the coalmine. I do know that something is vitally wrong with our
nation and that neither Congress nor our President is willing to take other
than divisive political actions.
When 30
major corporations can avoid paying taxes for seven years, when innumerable
corporate CEOs like Lowell McAdam of Verizon draw pay of $55,000 per day (yes,
per day!), when we have thousands of soldiers stationed in Germany and Japan 65
years after the end of WW II, then something is wrong. Turn off your TV and
learn what our real problems are and who's causing them. By the way, what book
commanded us to feed the hungry, clothe the naked, care for the widows and
orphans, and love our neighbor as ourselves? The left wing, socialist Occupiers
handbook or the Holy Bible?
Stephen
Anderson
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)